Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android |
| 2022-08-18 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| -- | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than Motorola razr (2022), with an 84.7 score against 81.1. The Galaxy A32 has Android OS, while Motorola razr (2022) comes with Android 12 OS. Even being the best we are comparing, the Galaxy A32 is an older, somewhat thicker and just a little heavier device than the Motorola razr (2022).
Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has more RAM. Motorola razr (2022) counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a bit larger screen, a greater display pixels density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A32, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a camera with a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A32 features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A32 counts with a way better battery life than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.