Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2022), having a overall score of 84.2 against 81.1. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is a lighter phone than Motorola razr (2022), but they have the same thickness. The Motorola razr (2022) has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit larger screen.
The Motorola razr (2022) features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has 2 GB more RAM. The Motorola razr (2022) shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels and a way higher video quality.
Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola razr (2022) has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.