Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is much better than the Motorola razr (2022)'s 81.1 score. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's body is a little bit lighter than the Motorola razr (2022), but it's just a little thicker and was released 2 years before. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an older 11 version and Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version.
Motorola razr (2022) features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G. Both of them have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, a better count of pixels per inch of screen and a display with the same size. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
Motorola razr (2022) features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G shoots clearer pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a bigger aperture and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.