Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-08-18 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2022) is just a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, with an 81.1 score against 81. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2022) has 12 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Motorola razr (2022) is a newer phone than the Galaxy C9 Pro, but it's a little heavier and a bit thicker.
Motorola razr (2022) has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bit larger screen and a bit greater screen density. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features just a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB.
Motorola razr (2022) has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery life than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 14 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.