Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| -- | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31s is a bit better than Motorola razr (2022), getting an 88 score against 81.1. Although it's the best in this comparison, Galaxy M31s is a older, a little bit heavier and thicker cellphone than the Motorola razr (2022). Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M31s has older 11 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version.
Motorola razr (2022) has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2022) also has 2 GB more RAM. The Motorola razr (2022) features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a bit worse pixels number per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Galaxy M31s captures a bit better photos and videos than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy M31s also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a much better 64 megapixels resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a much better battery duration than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.