Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is slightly better than the Motorola razr (2022), getting an 87.1 score against 81.1. The Galaxy Note9 construction is notably older, thicker and a little bit heavier than Motorola razr (2022). Galaxy Note9 features a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel quantity per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Note9 features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy Note9 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
Motorola razr (2022) features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.