Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2022) has a global score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s 79.3 overall score. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2022) has a newer 12 version and Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features. Even though Motorola razr (2022) is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, it's just a little thicker and much heavier.
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a brighter display than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and more pixels per display inch. The Motorola razr (2022) features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 64 GB more internal storage.
Motorola razr (2022) features a better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and also faster). The Motorola razr (2022) counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Motorola razr (2022) features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.