Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2016-10-20 |
| -- | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is slightly better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's 73.1 global score. Google Pixel has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores. The Google Pixel counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher number of pixels in each inch of display.
The Google Pixel shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a back facing camera with more mega pixels. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 3640mAh battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.