Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| -- | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, having a global score of 87.1 against 73.1. The LG Velvet features a very superior processor than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores. LG Velvet features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2460 resolution and a just a bit inferior pixel amount per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
LG Velvet features a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet counts with a greater camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The LG Velvet has better battery duration than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.