Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-11-18 |
| -- | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 426 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has a general score of 86.2, which is better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's 73.1 general score. These devices come with Android OS, but the Moto G200 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13 version. The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more cores.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a quite worse pixels count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a quite bigger display. Moto G200 5G has a much better camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because it has more internal storage. Moto G200 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 37% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.