Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-07-02 |
| -- | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 is a bit better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, getting a 76.1 score against 73.1. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A22 has the previous 12 version while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13 version. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A22, because it has a lot better display density, a quite larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2640.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with just a bit more memory for apps and games than Galaxy A22, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A22 has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 counts with a much better camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a lot more mega pixels camera. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.