Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-06-24 |
| -- | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.16 ounces |
| -- | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 426 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is much better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, getting an 84.6 score against 73.1. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A22 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display and a little smaller screen. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A22 5G shoots way better pictures and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a much better 48 mega pixels resolution camera. Galaxy A22 5G features a much better battery performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 37% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.