Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2023-12-11 |
| -- | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, with a global score of 79.9 against 73.1. These phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has newer 14 version while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13 version, giving a couple nice extra features and performance improvements.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a better looking display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a little bit smaller display, a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G has a superior battery performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 37% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A25 5G captures greater photographs and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.