Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-02 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.82 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30 has an overall score of 79.6, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's overall score of 73.1. Galaxy A30 features a lot better processing power than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more cores. Samsung Galaxy A30 features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a quite worse display density, a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy A30 has a much better camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a camera in the back with a much higher 16 mega pixels resolution. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features a better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A30 has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.