Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-03-11 |
| -- | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is just a bit better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's global score of 73.1. These devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy A35 5G has 14 version while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13, so it gives lots of additional features and enhanced performance.
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features just a little better performance than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 7 less processing cores, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a quite lower display pixel density, a quite smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a very superior camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3640mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.