Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2017-01-13 |
| -- | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.61 ounces |
| -- | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A5 (2017) is slightly better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, having a general score of 75.8 against 73.1. Galaxy A5 (2017) features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a way smaller screen, a bit lower pixel density and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 21% more battery capacity. The Galaxy A5 (2017) captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a lot better 16 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.