Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, getting an 83.8 score against 73.1. The Galaxy A50 features a lot better processing power than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster). The Galaxy A50 has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a little less pixels per screen inch and a little bit smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A50 features a little better battery duration than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 10% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.