Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is way better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, having a global score of 90.7 against 73.1. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much better performing processor than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
Galaxy A52 has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little lower pixel count in each inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a greater memory for applications and games than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a back facing camera with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A52 features longer battery duration than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.