Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-19 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, having a global score of 91.3 against 73.1. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13 version. The Galaxy A52 5G features a much faster processor than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a little smaller screen, a little bit less pixels per screen inch and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Galaxy A52 5G features more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with superior battery duration than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way better camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.