Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-09-01 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is way better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's 73.1 global score. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13 version. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit worse pixel density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy A52s features a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s has a much better hardware performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has 6 GB less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster).
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with better battery duration than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 24% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy A52s features a much better camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.