Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-11-15 |
| -- | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, with a general score of 85.2 against 73.1. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a little smaller display, a just a little worse pixels density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and they are faster). The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a very superior camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a back-facing camera with way more MP.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has just a bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has 3800mAh of battery capacity against 3640mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.