Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| -- | 4.06 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 5.6 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Alpha is a bit better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, with a global score of 76.3 against 73.1. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy Alpha has the newer 4.4.4 version while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy Alpha counts with a much better screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a way worse pixels count per inch of display, a lot smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 1280 x 720.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has 224 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Alpha has a way better performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has 10 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with 3 more CPU cores and an additional graphics processor.
Samsung Galaxy Alpha captures way better photos and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. They have a same resolution back camera. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 96 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.