Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-02-22 |
| -- | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.69 ounces |
| -- | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 426 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is way better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, having a score of 88.1 against 73.1. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy F62 has the older 11 version and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13 version. The Galaxy F62 counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a just a bit worse screen pixel density and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, they both have a same size display.
The Galaxy F62 has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 takes greater photos and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a camera with a lot higher resolution. Galaxy F62 has a much better battery duration than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 3640mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.