Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-27 |
| -- | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.74 ounces |
| -- | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's 73.1 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13, giving you a lot of extra features and performance enhancements.
The Galaxy Fold has a little sharper display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a little worse pixels count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher 1536 x 2152 resolution. The Galaxy Fold has a very superior CPU than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, and although they both have a 12 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold takes greater pictures and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. Both of them have a camera in the back with a 12 MP. Galaxy Fold has much more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy Fold counts with greater battery life than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 3640mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.