Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 426 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is way better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's 73.1 global score. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a quite worse pixels density and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, they both have a screen of the same size. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 takes much better photos and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. Both of them have a back camera with a 12 MP resolution.
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 20 features improved battery lifetime than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.