Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, with a general score of 81.2 against 73.1. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a brighter screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a little smaller screen, a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a little bit lower screen pixel density.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Note 3 has a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores and an extra graphics processor.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 shoots greater photos and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a camera in the back with more MP. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 3640mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.