Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-21 |
| -- | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a general score of 86.2, which is better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's score of 73.1. These devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has the previous 11 version while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a little bit better looking display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a quite worse display density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, they both have a screen of the same size. Galaxy Note10 Lite has a much better camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. They have a back camera with a 12 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has more storage for apps and games than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has greater battery performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 24 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.