Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| -- | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is a lot better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, with a 90.8 score against 73.1. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13. The Galaxy S20 FE has a very superior performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with more cores.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a just a bit worse pixels number in each screen inch, a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little smaller screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. Both have the same resolution camera.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a better memory to install applications and games than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 FE features superior battery life than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3640mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.