Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's score of 73.1. Both devices we are comparing here use the same Android 13 operating system, so both should count with all the same operating system features. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a little larger screen and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, and although they both have a 12 GB RAM, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger number of cores. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better battery duration than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 37% greater battery size. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot better camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a camera in the back with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.