Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2 |
| -- | 2014-06-23 |
| -- | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport is just a bit better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, having a global score of 77.8 against 73.1. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S5 Sport has a newer 4.4.2 version and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13, counting with some additional features and better performance.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a much better performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has 10 GB less RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores and an additional graphics processor. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a more vivid display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a much smaller display and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a back facing camera with way more MP. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 30 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.