Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-21 |
| -- | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is much better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, with an 81.7 score against 73.1. Samsung Galaxy S8 features an extremely better CPU than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores. Galaxy S8 has a better looking display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a better screen pixel density.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S8, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S8 counts with a way better camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. They have a back-facing camera with a 12 MP.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has greater battery performance than Galaxy S8, because it has a 21% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.