Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| -- | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| -- | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 426 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, having a overall score of 80.1 against 73.1. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a sharper display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixel density.
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with improved battery life than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3640mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. Both of them have the same resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.