Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| -- | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 426 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is much better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's 73.1 global score. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a little inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, a quite smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a way better camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a back camera with lot more MP. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features just a little better battery life than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity instead of 3640mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.