Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-04-05 |
| -- | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 426 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a general score of 79, which is slightly better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's 73.1 score. These phones include Android operating system, but Xperia XZ2 Compact has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13 version, providing you a couple additional features and increased performance.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixels amount per inch in the display.
Xperia XZ2 Compact shoots much better photos and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 27 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.