Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 83.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-25 |
| -- | 6.45 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray and Dream White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite is better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, having a score of 83.6 against 73.1. These phones have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has 10 version while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13 version. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has a better looking screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a little bit lower pixel count per inch in the screen, a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite features a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite takes a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.