Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 78 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-07-27 |
| -- | 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 426 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi A2 is a bit better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, having a 78 score against 73.1. The Xiaomi Mi A2 has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. Xiaomi Mi A2 has a little bit better display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a bit lower pixel density, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a little smaller screen.
The Xiaomi Mi A2 takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. They have the same resolution camera in the back. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has greater battery life than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a 3640mAh battery size against 3010mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.