Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2016-05-17 |
| -- | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 7.16 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 426 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Max is slightly better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, having a 77.5 score against 73.1. Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a little smaller display, a quite lower 1080 x 1920px resolution and a just a little lower screen pixels density.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features just a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Max has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more cpu cores.
The Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a greater camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a lot better resolution back camera. Xiaomi Mi Max counts with superior battery performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 4850mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.