Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-11-01 |
| -- | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has a global score of 76, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's score of 73.1. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13 version, so it provides some nice extra features.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with 3 more processing cores. Xiaomi Mi Note 2 features just a bit better display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a little smaller screen, a quite lower screen pixels density and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 takes way better photographs and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a back facing camera with a lot better 23 mega-pixels resolution. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has a little longer battery duration than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 12% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.