Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| -- | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is way better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's 73.1 overall score. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13 version. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite lower count of pixels per screen inch, they both have a display of the same size.
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much powerful processor than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has longer battery duration than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 3640mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.