Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | ZTE |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-12-21 |
| -- | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 20 is slightly better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, having a score of 77.8 against 73.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but ZTE Axon 20 has older 10 version and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13 version. ZTE Axon 20 features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a just a little worse pixels number in each inch of display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2460px, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than ZTE Axon 20, because it has more internal memory capacity. The ZTE Axon 20 has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores.
ZTE Axon 20 features a little longer battery duration than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has 4220mAh of battery capacity. The ZTE Axon 20 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.