Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-09-05 | 2017-10-19 |
| 4.82 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Advanced | AMOLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is much better than Motorola RAZR M, having an 81.6 score against 58.9. Although the Google Pixel 2 is heavier than Motorola RAZR M, it's a bit thinner and also noticeably newer. Google Pixel 2 features a superior performance than Motorola RAZR M, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and 3 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better display than Motorola RAZR M, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 1920, much more pixels per inch in the screen and a larger display. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola RAZR M, although it has no SD extension slot.
The Google Pixel 2 shoots way better videos and photos than Motorola RAZR M, because it has a way better video quality and a much better resolution camera in the back. Google Pixel 2 counts with better battery duration than Motorola RAZR M, because it has 2700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 2 is also cheaper than the Motorola RAZR M.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.