Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.0, 2.3.6 | -- |
| 2012-04-03 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.15 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Kevlar | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 607 hours standby time 17.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a lot better than the Motorola RAZR MAXX, having a overall score of 81.6 against 62. The Google Pixel 2 body is extremely newer, just a little lighter and thinner than the Motorola RAZR MAXX. Google Pixel 2 features a superior processing unit than Motorola RAZR MAXX, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with 6 more processing cores and 3 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 has a better screen than Motorola RAZR MAXX, because it has a larger display, a much better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution. The Google Pixel 2 features a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola RAZR MAXX, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 2 takes much better videos and photos than Motorola RAZR MAXX, because it has a camera with a way higher 12.2 megapixels resolution, a much better (4K) video quality and a lot larger aperture to take better low light photography. The Motorola RAZR MAXX features improved battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 2700mAh.
Google Pixel 2 is a bit more expensive than the Motorola RAZR MAXX, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.