Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2017-02-24 |
| -- | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 413 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than Motorola razr Plus (2024), with an 81 score against 75.7. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola razr Plus (2024) has Android 14 version. Galaxy C9 Pro features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores.
Motorola razr Plus (2024) has a much better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2640 resolution, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
The Motorola razr Plus (2024) counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Galaxy C9 Pro has a little longer battery duration than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because it has a 5% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.