Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| -- | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 413 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is much better than the Motorola razr Plus (2024), having an 87.1 score against 75.7. The Motorola razr Plus (2024) features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2640px and a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little larger screen.
Galaxy Note9 features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a better camera than Motorola razr Plus (2024). They have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rate and a same resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy Note9 counts with just a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr Plus (2024), because it has a 5% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.