Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| -- | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPO | AMOLED |
| -- | 441 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is slightly better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s general score of 79.2. Google Pixel 2 has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Google Pixel 2 has a lot better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a really smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a way better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a way higher video resolution and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.