Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 15 | Android 5.0 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2015-03-01 |
| -- | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPO | S-LCD 3 |
| -- | 441 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than the HTC One M9, having a overall score of 79.2 against 77.7. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has newer 15 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, providing some nice extra features. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s construction is notably newer and way thinner than HTC One M9's, although it is a lot heavier.
HTC One M9 counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a way smaller screen. The HTC One M9 has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has 13 GB lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64 bits CPU.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better memory for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a better camera than HTC One M9, because it has a much better video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.