Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2016-09-29 |
| -- | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | IPS LCD |
| -- | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a general score of 79.2, which is just a bit better than LG V20's score of 77. Even though Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is somewhat heavier than the LG V20, it's a lot thinner and much newer. LG V20 features a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display.
LG V20 counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes a lot better videos and photos than LG V20, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V20, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a really longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.