Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 15 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-05-10 |
| -- | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | OLED |
| -- | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting a overall score of 83.7 against 79.2. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The LG V50 ThinQ features a really superior performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a superior camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much more mega pixels camera and a lot higher video definition.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has slightly more memory to store more apps and games than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.