Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-06-20 |
| -- | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is a little bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting a global score of 82.3 against 79.2. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A60 has an older 11 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. Galaxy A60 has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy A60 counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.