Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-10-20 |
| -- | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6 inches |
| -- | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 411 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with a score of 84.2 against 79.2. Galaxy A7 (2018) features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a way better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video definition and a much more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.